Talk about this meme #trump#

1) Whether a token can rise or not can be thought of in terms of the possibility of a "second chance" and how the benefits play out.

Here is a very classic analogy to understand:

Firstly, bome is considered a miracle and a case of becoming rich quickly. In a short period, it has allowed many people to achieve financial freedom, while more people have spent a year and a half with little hope of recouping their investment.

Secondly, Trump completed the largest and fastest event in the entire financial history in a short period of time.
Intergenerational wealth transfer.
This is their commonality. They all have that kind of volcanic eruption style of starting at the peak. Bome, from then on, they decline all the way, heading towards oblivion.

Trump has been on a downward trend since reaching its peak.
The question arises—
Will bome have another highlight?
Will Trump shine again?
I think Bome won't, but Trump will!

The main judgment logic is:

Scarcity/Non-fungibility
After bome, there are fartcoin, act, pnut, trump, useless... The wealth effect comes in waves, bome has no scarcity at all, interest groups, conspiracy groups, have no motivation to let it shine again, the return on investment is too unprofitable - are we playing nostalgia? How is that possible! Pull it up to help the retail investors get out of their positions, do charity? How is that possible!

But Trump is different; there is only this one in the whole world, which has a unique exclusivity.

The secondary recycling of such a large IP is obviously something that interest groups and the unseen hand behind them cannot afford to give up; recreating another Trump would be very costly and the likelihood is very low. The best option is to revitalize the first one.

In simple terms, it's all about the economics behind it: is it better to create something new or to revitalize the old?

First, which cost is lower?
Second, which one has a higher return?
Ultimately choose the one with the lowest cost but the highest return.

The most important thing is that cases like Trump are no longer a cost issue, but rather that it's impossible to have another one. Therefore, secondary revitalization has become the only solution!

2) Psychological Dimension: The Strong Appeal of Older Men
Men's admiration for the strong, the crypto old schoolers, those who made money, with mouths full of oil, overflowing with a sense of superiority in the coin circle. They are well aware of the brutal laws of the investment world: survival of the fittest. Therefore, relatively speaking, they are the most admiring of strength, the most disdainful chain of people.

They are the old vested interests in BTC, ETH, and so on. They look down on the newcomers today, the small players who play with so-called junk altcoins and memes.

However, the classification of trump in their minds is not a meme, but a presidential coin! This uniqueness drives their arrogant and closed hearts, leading them to choose to buy trump!

What pepe, what fartcoin, none of them catch their eye.

But in the whole world, the unique and most powerful president's only meme, Trump, they will choose to embrace.

Therefore, Trump's ability to resonate with the old money's desire for power is also the support for Trump's continued opportunity if he returns to the presidency.

3) Basic Knowledge/Current Situation
Looking at the K-line, there is support for Trump downward, and the decline is limited; there may be 3-10 times the fear upward. The risk-reward ratio is good.

And, coming down from a high point, continuously falling and falling. If there are to be two opportunities, then this is clearly a process of extreme low absorption of chips, with the purpose of having a big wave later!

After all, isn't ETH just played like this; after all, many things that are unusual must have their reasons.

Of course, the core point is:

If you were Trump’s operating group, would you be willing to just give up this IP? Wouldn't it be a pity? You see, this is a thought exercise, this is common sense.

If you ask me, I would say I am unwilling to give up, what a pity.

Statement: The above is just my personal reasoning, and you can also interpret it as wishful thinking. For reference only. Personally, I have allocated a little. After all, betting on one's own understanding is a basic skill for adults to align their actions with their words, not just talk.